Article
The second summary in the Why I Did Not Become Shia series, centered on the article's argument that Twelver Imami doctrine compromises tawhid al-rububiyyah by assigning divine powers and unseen knowledge to the Imams.
Overview
The second summary in the Why I Did Not Become Shia series, centered on the article's argument that Twelver Imami doctrine compromises tawhid al-rububiyyah by assigning divine powers and unseen knowledge to the Imams.
Quick metadata
Details
This second article in the series focuses on lordship and the author’s claim that Twelver Imami doctrine violates tawhid al-rububiyyah by attributing to the Imams powers and qualities that belong to Allah alone.
The article cites reports in which the Imams are described as exercising cosmic authority, possessing vast control over events, or knowing the unseen. In the author’s reading, these descriptions amount to a practical reassignment of divine prerogatives to created figures, even when pious language surrounds them.
It therefore argues that the problem is not merely exaggerated veneration, but a deeper theological structure in which the Imams become agents of creation, decree, provision, and hidden knowledge in ways irreconcilable with pure Islamic monotheism.
Within the series, this chapter lays the groundwork for later critiques by claiming that the rupture begins at the level of the most basic creed: who truly possesses lordship, power, and knowledge of the unseen.
Original publication
This page presents an organized in-site version of the article within the website archive, while the original publication remains available on Alukah Network.