Defending the Sunnah and Refuting the Objections to the Hadith: 'A People Who Entrust Their Affairs to a Woman Will Not Prosper'

Details

Defending the Sunnah and Refuting the Objections to the Hadith

”A People Who Entrust Their Affairs to a Woman Will Not Prosper”

This article responds to a set of modern objections directed against the famous hadith narrated by Abu Bakrah and recorded by al-Bukhari concerning entrusting public rule to a woman. It frames the issue not merely as one legal disagreement among others, but as part of a broader contemporary assault on the authority of the Sunnah, the integrity of its transmitters, and the reliability of the canonical hadith tradition.

The first section addresses the attempt to undermine the hadith by attacking Abu Bakrah himself. The article argues that invoking the old legal incident connected to his testimony does not damage his standing as a reliable transmitter. It carefully distinguishes between the rules of courtroom testimony and the rules of hadith transmission, noting that Abu Bakrah’s عدالت was never rejected by the hadith critics and that the major collections received his narrations.

It then turns to technical hadith objections. The fact that Abu Bakrah alone narrates the hadith is presented as no flaw at all, since many foundational reports are transmitted from a single Companion. The article also rejects the claim that al-Hasan al-Basri’s narration from Abu Bakrah is broken, pointing out that al-Bukhari relied on established knowledge of hearing here and that the objection does not stand against his method.

A further cluster of objections is described as rationalistic or historically driven: the example of Bilqis, the success of some modern female rulers, and the assumption that contemporary political categories can overrule revealed texts. The article answers that historical success or failure is not the criterion by which prophetic legislation is judged, and that a narrative report about a prior queen cannot overturn a normative statement from the Prophet in the final Shari’ah.

Finally, the article rejects the claim that defending this hadith amounts to sacralizing al-Bukhari over the Qur’an. On the contrary, it argues that defending the hadith means defending the Sunnah as revelation that explains the Qur’an. The article’s broader message is that many modern objections proceed by methodological confusion: mixing legal categories, privileging contemporary assumptions over transmitted evidence, and treating canonical hadith criticism as though it were intellectually naive.

Original publication

This article is also published on Alukah Network

This page presents an organized in-site version of the article within the website archive, while the original publication remains available on Alukah Network.

Go to the article on Alukah Network